The Jewing of Anthropology
Posted by Socrates in Africa, anthropology, Boas, Boasian Jews, Claude Levi-Strauss, college, colonialism in Africa, communism, Cultural Marxism, jewed culture, jewed education system, Jewed science, Marx and England, Marxism, race, Race Denial, race science, racial science, Socrates, Soviet Union, universities, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline, White inventions, white nationalism, White philosophy, White rule is better, White thought, White vs. non-White countries, White-culture-as-superior at 6:05 pm | Permanent Link
(Above: the Jewish “scientist” and race-denier Franz Boas. It was recently discovered that Boas produced fraudulent work [surprise!]).
Before it became corrupted, there used to be an honest scientific field known as Physical Anthropology (i.e., the study of man). Then around 1900 came some new baloney known as Cultural Anthropology, which is a whole different thing. Cultural Anthropology rejects the idea that race is important and biological. Cultural Anthropology is mostly about fake Jewish or Marxist “scientists” trying to convince people that all of the human cultures are equally important (but of course they’re not. White Western culture is superior) . Cultural Anthropology is now considered to be a legitimate part of anthropology even though it was founded by liars and race-deniers.
 Cultural Anthropology was pioneered by Jewish race-hucksters such as Franz Boas (often called “the Father of American Anthropology” – there’s a scary thought), Claude Levi-Strauss and Ashley Montagu. “Race” doesn’t exist, those Jews say, or, if it does exist, it’s meaningless. But that’s baloney. The truth is that “race” is the prime reason why White Western countries rule the world and Black countries are third-world toilets. Thanks to those idiots, roughly half of all anthropologists today believe that “race” doesn’t really exist – can you imagine that? That’s akin to weathermen not believing in the existence of rain. (Here’s a question to ask an anthropologist: “why are all the least-successful countries, without exception, Black or Brown”? Newbies, the continent of Africa is in much worse condition today precisely because most of the Whites left Africa by 1980)
 “By 1926 every major department of anthropology was headed by Boas’s students, the majority of whom were Jewish.” — Dr. Kevin MacDonald, in his important book “The Culture of Critique”; see page 25
 Allow me to say something about the denial of race or creed: the Communist Party has long said (as late as 2001, judging by web searches) that all humans are equal regardless of race, creed, sex, etc., so what does that make Boas and his followers? Right. They’re all Marxists, even though they would surely deny that. If you believe in human equality, then you’re a Marxist, whether you know it or admit it or not; egalitarianism is part of the “standard Marxist worldview”; the top Soviet official and theoretician Nikolai Bukharin, for example, wrote this way back in 1920: “Should the Russian worker and the Russian peasant look upon the Germans, the French, the British, the Jews, the Chinese, or the Tartars, as enemies, irrespective of the class to which these belong? Are the Russian workers and peasants entitled to hate or to regard with suspicion those who belong to another nation, for the sole reason that these latter speak a different tongue, that their skins are black or yellow, that they have different customs and laws? Obviously, this would be quite wrong. The German workers, the French workers, the Negro workers, are just as much proletarians as the Russians are.” (bold text is mine) That was very uncommon thinking in 1920, when “racism” was the norm. Such thinking isn’t surprising, however, when you realize what communism was designed to be: an attack on White Western civilization; it’s Karl Marx’s bad luck that communism didn’t take hold in the West, as he had hoped, at least not officially; unofficially it’s been here awhile