12 June, 2009

When Diversity Doesn’t Count…

Posted by Socrates in jewed culture, jewed law, Jewish arrogance, Jewish Tyranny, Jewish warmongering, New York Times, Socrates, World War II at 3:06 am | Permanent Link

by Christopher Donovan. (Trivia: back in 1940, the Jewish manager of the New York Times, Julius Ochs Adler, was largely responsible – due to his meddling – for the start of the peace-time military draft. Why did the military need a draft in mid-1940 if America wasn’t at war until late 1941? Perhaps Adler knew something that most Americans didn’t…):


  • 16 Responses to “When Diversity Doesn’t Count…”



      “Wright says ‘Jews’ keeping him from Obama (AP)”

      Thu Jun 11, 7:17 pm ET

      HAMPTON, Va. – President Barack Obama’s controversial former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, blamed “them Jews” in an interview this week for keeping him from speaking to the president, but later apologized.

      Wright, the former pastor of Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ, said he hasn’t spoken to Obama since he became president.

      “Them Jews ain’t going to let him talk to me. I told my baby daughter that he’ll talk to me in five years when he’s a lame duck, or in eight years when he’s out of office,” Wright told the Daily Press of Newport News following a Tuesday night sermon at the 95th annual Hampton University Ministers’ Conference.

      “They will not let him to talk to somebody who calls a spade what it is. … I said from the beginning: He’s a politician; I’m a pastor. He’s got to do what politicians do.”

      Wright issued a statement Thursday that he was “disturbed and deeply saddened” that his comments were stirring discussion again.

      “I apologize for the way I framed my comments. I mis-spoke and I sincerely meant no harm or ill-will to the American Jewish community or the Obama administration,” Wright said. “I have great respect for the Jewish faith and the foundational (and central) part of our Judeo-Christian tradition.”

      Obama was a longtime member of the church but resigned from it and cut ties with Wright after videos surfaced during the presidential campaign showing Wright’s sometimes provocative sermons. Wright’s incendiary comment included shouting “God damn America” and accusing the government of creating AIDS.

      In the interview Tuesday, Wright also criticized Obama for not sending a U.S. delegation to the World Conference on Racism held recently in Geneva, Switzerland, saying Obama chose not to for fear of offending Jews and Israel.

      “Ethnic cleansing is going on in Gaza. Ethnic cleansing (by) the Zionist is a sin and a crime against humanity, and they don’t want Barack talking like that because that’s anti-Israel,” Wright said.

      The White House declined to comment to the Associated Press on Thursday on Wright’s remarks


    2. Parsifal Says:

      This blogger makes a good point when he writes that Jews probably don’t see themselves as a dominant force in society because of their obsession with seeing themselves as eternal “victims”. They live in the best neighborhoods, send their kids to the best schools and universities and have the cushiest, best paying jobs. They even have a shittly little outlaw state in Palestine they can scurry off to when there’s trouble. Yet they are constantly unhappy and always whining about how much everyone hates them and wants to “get” them. The world is not enough for the Jew, he always demands more from his host, like a bloated intestinal parsite.

    3. Ein Says:

      True enough Jews they always want more. (Doesn’t everyone?) But they’re under no illusions about the enormous power and control they wield. They know the score far better than anyone. We gentiles are the ones (most of us) who don’t grasp it. Most naive gentiles haven’t a clue, and that’s the way the Jews want to keep it.

      Why else are they so obsessive about hiding it and denying it? If they were truly naive about their power, they would be making no attempts to conceal it. They wouldn’t have any idea what you’re talking about. But, instead of being willing to discuss such issues openly, they resort to evasions and distractions, hysterical name-calling, vicious smears, and as a last resort, outright banning – by law – of inconvenient subjects that they don’t want aired. If they had nothing to conceal, they wouldn’t go to such lengths.

      Their very unwillingness to discuss the extent of their power is proof of it. Their success in getting laws passed to outlaw criticism or discussion is proof of it. They wouldn’t pass these laws and have all their many protective organizations if there were nothing to hide.

      Do the Amish have special laws and anti-defamation organizations to protect them from uncomfortable questions? Are the Amish being persecuted because they’re just a small minority who are hated for their , uh, “religion”? I don’t think so.

      Jews “probably don’t see themselves as a dominant force in society”? Oh, C’mon! Believe me, they are under no such illusions. It’s the gentiles who are under all the false illusions about helpless, poor, persecuted Jews — not the Jews themselves. And as I said, that’s the exactly the way they intend to keep it.

    4. Ein Says:

      Sorry for not proof-reading that before I hit the button!

    5. Hoff Says:

      British Invasion of Russia 1918-1922

      On March 3, 1918, Vladimir Lenin negotiated the separate peace at Brest-Litovsk. Shortly afterwards, on July 23, 1918, British Armies invaded Russia. The initial goal of this intervention that lasted over four years and ended with evacuation of the British troops at Vladivostok in October of 1922 was to bring Russia back into the war against Germany.

      The Great Britain and her Allies attacked Russia from the North, landing troops in Murmansk and Archangelsk, from the East, landing troops in Vladivostok and from the South, landing troops at Batumi. The coalition lead by Britain lost about 235,000 soldiers, the Red Army about 1,000,000. Joseph Stalin took part in this war which helps to explains his initial reluctance to enter the war against Germany on the side of the Great Britain two decades later.


      Anyone have more info on this?

    6. Ein Says:

      “Anyone have more info on this?”

      Well, speaking just from memory, Lord Kitchener of Britain went on a secret mission to Russia to seek a negotiated peace (for WW1). Kitchener’s ship was torpedoed in the North Sea and went down with all aboard. There were powerful forces in Britain opposing his efforts at peace: bankers and such who wanted to keep the war going. And Churchill too! Some say it was not a torpedo but a bomb. The cause of the disaster has never been resolved and remains a mystery to this day. You can Wiki “Kitchener” for more thorough details.

      Lord Afred Douglas claimed that Churchill was in the pay of the Jews and was behind this — or something like that. He was then sued by Churchill and despite his aristocratic connections and title, went to prison for having said that. There were powerful forces at work who wanted the war prolonged until Lenin could arrive in Russia and take over.
      Wiki Douglas for more.

      I believe this has been written about here before, in detail, but a long while ago.

    7. Parsifal Says:

      Ein, your point is taken but I still don’t think Jews see themselves as a united, monolithic force, with all Gentiles as their real or potential enemies. That is a little too simplistic, wouldn’t you agree? Many Jews now marry and associate with Gentiles as freely as they once stuck to their own kind. The modern Jew is probably conflicted about his loyalty to his fellow tribesmen and to the Gentile society he lives in. He has something of an identity crisis, you might say. But whether a Jew thinks of himself as a Zionist, a Marxist, an American or even a Catholic, he still has that Jewish mentality that will always separate him from the Goyim, whether he realizes it or not.

    8. Parsifal Says:

      Hoff, what you’re referring to is the Russian Civil War of 1918-1921. The US and England participated in that conflict on the side of the pro-Czarist Whites, who were fighting the Reds. When the White Army was poised to rescue the Czar and his family, who were under house arrest in the Urals, some Red offical, maybe Lenin himself, ordered the Romanovs to be murdred. The Germans helped smuggle the exiled Lenin back into Russia during WWI, hoping that Lenin’s Revolution would end the war on the Eastern Front and free up the Wehrmacht to fight on the Western Front. But the Soviets always angrily denied they needed the help of Russia’s wartime enemy to start their Revolution.

      Apparently, there wasn’t much enthusiasm among US and British forces to fight with the Whites. Allied troops were burned out from the four years of fighting WWI and probably didn’t like the prospect of fighting another protracted conflict on behalf of some other country’s deposed ruler. I believe Stalin led the Red Army’s failed campaign to stop Poland’s war of independence from Russia. So Stalin was more than happy to exact revenge on Poland in 1939 by signing the Non-Agression Pact with the Nazis.

    9. Hoff Says:

      Thank you for the info. Of course l knew that England had troops in Sovjet, but l diden’t know that it was such a big troop and under so long time.

      “The coalition lead by Britain lost about 235,000 soldiers, the Red Army about 1,000,000.”

      lf you lose next to a 1/4 of a million men l guess it’s at least one million troop. America send some troop to east Sovjet.

      “I believe this has been written about here before, in detail, but a long while ago.”

      lf anyone can find the link it would be much appreciated.

    10. Hoff Says:

      l knew that the germans helped Lenin to Russia, via Stockholm and that the reson was that Lenin had promised to stop the war Russia-Germany so that the germans could have a cease-fire on the eastern front and hence could move the troops to the western front. l knew that there was som english troops in Russia and later Sovjet, but as l have understud it was to help the Whites, not to make Sovjet go to war against Germany.

      The whole story about GB troops in Sovjet there are some sordid things about. They don’t tell you that in school and it’s not mainstream knowledge. l’m sure there are some jews lurking in muddy waters here.

      l read somewhere that GB and Churchill was offering the Tsar som 435 million, l guess pound, if he would make one last all out attack on the germans. The Rothschilds had boycotted the Tsar from at least 1880, maybe earlier.

      ln America Jacob Schiff went on an all out war against the Tsar. According to Encyclopedia Judaica from 1971, entry: Schiff Jacob, he had granted Japan a 400, four-zero-zero million loan 19o4. You can take that X 25 to 30 to get todays money. This book is mandatory reading. l have read it at least ten times and l still find new info in this book. l don’t buy books but this one is one of the few books l want to buy. Copy and save.


    11. Hoff Says:

      Just lost a post “€%%%#%&/

      Mandatory reading.


    12. Ein Says:

      Hoff Says: “l knew that the germans helped Lenin to Russia, via Stockholm and that the reson was that Lenin had promised to stop the war Russia-Germany ”

      Lenin had been living in Switzerland (Zurich, I think it was), not Sweden — or perhaps he was then in Italy. I know he owned a villa in Italy, which I have seen, on the Isle of Capri, his favorite home, next to the villa of the Krupps (interestingly). No, I’m not making this stuff up! [But I don’t know if he owned the villa prior to the revolution. I suspect not.] He endowed a public library on the island in his name and remains very popular there to this day. He was sent in a sealed train from Switzerland through wartime Germany into Russia to start his revolution there. He did pull Russia out of the war, giving up a vast swath of Russian territory (which, however, was all regained after WW2).

    13. Ein Says:

      Yes, I checked and he was in Zurich. Here is a picture of his house there.
      You were right about Sweden. It seems he took a circuitous route: through Germany up to Sweden, then through Finland to Russia — not going there directly. Well, that figures since the front on the continent would have been disrupted by war and was probably impassable.

      In the same Wiki article, I found this astonishingly apt quote. I hate to give currency to the ideology of Lenin, but he certainly seems to be on the money here. It sounds eerily like a description of the USA a century later. Something to think about.

      “According to Lenin, in the last stage of capitalism, in pursuit of greater profits than the home market can offer, capital is exported. This leads to the division of the world between international monopolist firms and to … colonizing large parts of the world in support of their businesses. Imperialism is thus an advanced stage of capitalism, one relying on the rise of monopolies and on the export of capital (rather than goods)”

      Monument to Lenin on Capri:
      Via Krupp

      More amazingly, Lenin’s wife’s name was Nadezhda Krupskaya, “-skaya” being the feminine ending of Krup.

    14. ein Says:

      I don’t know if Lenin had any connection with the Krups (the fabulously wealthy German munition makers) and haven’t been able to establish any. Nor if the Krups were Jews (or originally so). But the repeated coincidences are simply amazing.

    15. ein Says:

      Let me add that, for a revolutionary, he appears to have lived VERY WELL. No starving revolutionary he! The financing must have been coming from somewhere. And generous too.

    16. ein Says:

      [After serving a sentence for revolutionary activities, ending in 1900] “he traveled throughout Russia and Europe. He lived in Zurich, Geneva , Munich, Prague, Vienna, Manchester and London. Until the revolutions of 1917, he spent most of his time in [Western] Europe.” [Wiki]

      Here’s an excellent map of Lenin’s famous “sealed train” that brought him to Russia. A circuitous route indeed!