15 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in America, communism, communism-as-Jewish, counterculture, Frankfurt School, jewed culture, jewed politics, Jewish aggression, Jewish behavior versus White behavior, Jewish brain features, Jewish counterculture, jewish hate & hypocrisy, Marcuse, nation-building/nation-wrecking, Sixties, socialism, Socrates, War On White People at 1:32 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: Herbert Marcuse)

Jews have waged war on White Western culture in many ways: via communism, via socialism, via feminism. But another way the Jews waged war on White culture is via the 1960s “counterculture” movement (which had slogans such as “peace, love, dope, fuck the pigs, fuck your parents, never trust anyone over 30!”). The counterculture movement was built and steered by Jews and was launched largely via (Jewish radical) Herbert Marcuse’s 1964 book “One-Dimensional Man” (granted, a few gentiles were prominent in that movement, e.g., Tom Hayden and Timothy Leary; as someone once noted, “the late 1960s spelled the end of sane America”).

[Article].

14 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in America, America the White nation, America's founders, immigration, immigration bills/laws, jewed Congress, jewed politics, multiculturalism, nation-building/nation-wrecking, naturalization act of 1790, Schumer, Socrates, Trump, Trump's policies at 12:33 pm | Permanent Link

President Trump: consider the racial implications of this information (below) when you’re thinking about immigration policies (after all, you’re not really going to let the “Gang of Eight” pro-immigration Jew, Sen. Charles Schumer, derail your immigration promises to the American people, are you?): the first 3 immigration naturalization laws of the then-new United States of America (laws passed in 1790, 1795 and 1798) restricted citizenship to Whites only. Yes, to Whites only. The laws clearly show the thoughts and intentions of America’s founders. The founders obviously saw America as a White republic, i.e., they did not intend for America to be multicultural [1].


.

[1] Senator Charles Schumer has been the leader of the congressional movement to pass amnesty laws for the benefit of illegal immigrants. Schumer was the leader of the so-called “Gang of 8” senators who pushed for immigration “reform”

13 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Socrates, William Pierce, William Pierce Wednesday at 6:49 pm | Permanent Link

by Dr. William Pierce.

[…]

“The public cannot approve of a moral leper without exposing its own moral weakness. The whole world sees a weak and foolish American public led by foolish, weak, self-indulgent criminals, who dance to whatever tune is played by the Jewish media bosses. And I mean the whole world, not just Osama bin Laden and others who have a personal score to settle with us. This loss of moral authority, this loss of national dignity and prestige, will not be easily restored, and it may cost us dearly. Americans may not understand this now, because they are still comfortable — but we will see.”

[Article].

13 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in anti-White themes, Big Jew, dispossession & destruction, jewed Congress, jewed culture, jewed politics, Jewish power, Socrates, Trump, Trumpphobia, War On White Males, War On White People, white nationalism at 6:13 pm | Permanent Link

Big Jew: “In this, the era of Trump, you will always make certain that White supremacy and White nationalism are portrayed as horrible and evil. Understand?”

U.S. Senators: “Yes, master! We serve only you!”

[Article].

12 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in California, federal immigration laws, federal laws, illegal immigration, immigration, mestizos, Mexcrement, Mexico, Mexinvasion, Socrates at 8:46 pm | Permanent Link

Sorry, Californicate, but the joke is on you. State laws can’t supersede federal laws [1]. Federal law bans “aiding and abetting” illegal immigrants.

[Article].
.

[1] “The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land. It provides that state courts are bound by the supreme law; in case of conflict between federal and state law, the federal law must be applied.” — Wikipedia

11 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in 'easy credit', 'I-want-it-now' culture, bankers, banking, credit, credit cards, jewed culture, jewed economics, jewed finance, Socrates at 1:09 pm | Permanent Link

White Woman: “Let me see if I understand this: I need a good credit score so that I can buy expensive stuff and go into debt so that my credit score will go way down and I won’t be able to buy on credit anymore? Is that right?”

Jewish banker: “That’s the nugget of it! Remember my motto: Why Wait ‘Til Next Week When You Can Buy It Right Now?”

[Article].

8 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in jewed culture, jewed politics, Jewed religion, quotations, quotations about jews, Savitri Devi, Socrates, white nationalism, White Nationalists, White philosophy, White thought at 10:10 pm | Permanent Link

This quote should appear on every monument in America. Best quote I’ve read in months – no, in years.

7 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in 'hate', 'hate' haters, Charlottesville rally, Congress, jewed Congress, jewed culture, jewed politics, Jewish behavior versus White behavior, Jewish brain features, Jewish chosenness, Jewish deceit, Jewish racism, race, racism accusations, Senate, Socrates, Trump, white nationalism, White Nationalists, White philosophy, White thought at 12:37 pm | Permanent Link

…or, as the “resolution” backers say, it will require Trump to denounce White “hate groups” (all five of them, and even the fake ones, presumably). Is someone getting nervous? Hmmm? Can you guess who might be nervous? That’s right: ever since the Charlottesville rally, powerful Jews are getting nervous, hence this stupid and unnecessary resolution. Of course, Jewish groups are the biggest hate groups on Earth. In fact, the Jews invented bigotry many centuries ago. Will the Senate resolution urge Trump to condemn Jewish hate? Betcha not.

[Article].

7 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Socrates, William Pierce, William Pierce Wednesday at 10:59 am | Permanent Link

(This week’s William Pierce Wednesday item is being posted today instead)

by Dr. William Pierce.

[…]

“After a good, long whine along this line intended to soften up and “sensitize” the Gentile world, the Jews became much more specific in their complaints at the beginning of last year. Conveniently, they waited until after a law outlawing racist and anti-Semantic (sic) statements was passed in Switzerland. This made the Swiss not only worry that they were being “insensitive” by opposing Jewish demands, they also wondered if they could get into legal trouble. With this anti-dissent law in place Jewish pressure groups claimed that many Jews stashed their money in secret, numbered Swiss bank accounts during the 1930s and early 1940s in anticipation of difficulties with the German authorities. Then these Jews were “holocausted” and their money remains in secret accounts. They claimed the Swiss had not done all they could to try to locate heirs of the depositors. They =owed= all of that money in dormant accounts to the Jews — =plus interest.=”

[Article].

6 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in America, crime, jewed culture, pop culture, pop culture vs. real culture, Socrates, tv, TV culture, William Pierce at 2:00 pm | Permanent Link

Seen: a 1970s movie highlighting the dangers of young people hitchhiking. Yes, it was sort of a cheesy movie, but it was also socially interesting. Let’s consider that:

Back in the 1940s, it was common for young people (especially military soldiers) to hitchhike rides on the highway with strangers. It was not dangerous to hitchhike back then.

But in the modern era, it is dangerous for a young person to hitchhike, especially a female. Too many nutjobs are around.

What changed? Why was hitchhiking not dangerous back then, but is dangerous now? Well, as Dr. William Pierce noted, there was an unusual and dramatic increase in crime in America between the 1940s and the 1970s [1]. Even when you include Black and Hispanic population increases, the crime statistics are still very unusual. Crime increased dramatically during that period. Negative cultural change in America is the reason why it increased.

Getting back to hitchhiking dangers: many Americans don’t feel “connected” to other Americans anymore. Therefore, it is much more likely for a stranger to commit violence against a hitchhiker. After all, it’s easier to harm someone when you don’t have any positive feelings, or feelings of compassion, for them. America is now a giant country full of isolated strangers. One big reason for that fact is that DVD movies, TV series and video games isolate people in their own homes. Millions of people spend days, maybe even weeks, never interacting with live humans, but only interacting with “the electronic Jew.” That can warp your mind, in many ways.

Modern America is a country full of strangers who often don’t care one bit about their fellow citizens, and our Jewish “entertainment culture” is at least partly to blame for that.
.

[1] “The total population of the United States slightly more than doubled during the 66 years between 1930 and 1996, while the prison population increased by more than a factor of ten. Why? How could that have happened in this kinder and gentler age? Isn’t that contradictory to everything we’ve been taught about the country becoming more and more enlightened and with a hundred times as many so-called “entitlement” programs and job-training programs and rehabilitation programs and Head Start programs and so forth now as then? How does that square with the government’s recent claims that crime of all sorts is falling these days? Murders are down, they tell us. Robberies are down. Then why does the prison population keep increasing?” — Dr. William Pierce, “When the Barriers Come Down,” American Dissident Voices Broadcast of January 23, 1999