Vanguard News Network

Oh, dear: sometimes a woman isn’t a woman after all! What a scandal! (Which is exactly what the Left wants: endless conflict. This destabilizes White society. A leftist maxim: “there must always be tension and conflict in society.” That of course takes a page from Karl Marx himself: change via constant conflict. In other words, the Left doesn’t want you to have peace, White man! The Left wants you to have an ulcer by the time you’re 30!).

When you’re a White male, everything’s gravy. As it should be. But when you’re not a White male (i.e., when you’re The Other), well, things can get complicated [1].

News quote: “A festival meant to showcase the experiences of women is being criticized for headlining a transgender composer, and the organizers of the festival responded by accusing their critics of transphobia.”

[Article].

.

[1] “The Other” means “anyone who isn’t a White male”

“Crazy Train” by Ozzy Osbourne (1980). This song is about the Cold War — 44 years of bullshit!

[Video].

Guitar tutorial: [Here].

What they say liberalism is: “a progressive movement to combat racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, transphobia, environmental pollution, etc., etc., etc.”

What liberalism really is: an endless attack on White, male culture, using a variety of sneaky methods. Liberalism is a hate movement, a giant hate crime. (In Arizona, liberals closed down a hunting club. Why? Because they didn’t like the club. Too White, too male, too many guns (*shudder*). If liberals don’t like something, it must “go”).

Importantly, this “green” Vermont bill is part of a global movement called “the 30 by 30 movement”:

“More than 70 countries have signed on to the 30 by 30 goal, including the United States. President Joe Biden signed an executive order during his first week in office to conserve 30% of U.S. ocean area as well as 30% of the land by 2030.”

[Article].

Only an idiot would champion “democracy.” I mean, negroes and retards voting? Corrupt jerks in the Senate? Are you kidding? Why would anybody want that? Democracy is a total loser. Granted, America’s founders didn’t give us a democracy (they gave us a White republic), but America nonetheless morphed into a multicultural democracy circa 1964 with the horrible and illegal Civil Rights Act (which of course came from a Jew: congressman Emanuel Celler).

Today, America is not led by normal, White Western people. It’s led by freaks and weirdos: Jews, Browns, Blacks, leftists, and general scumbags.

Turning now to Professor Revilo Oliver (1908-1994): he was a smart man. I’m guessing his IQ was around 150 or even higher (normal IQ is around 100). Dr. Oliver is saying here: “We must dump the stupid idea of democracy because it’s killing the West.” He basically says here that we must embrace a Nazi-type government (i.e., authoritarian/autocratic) in order to save the West from collapse:

“In our civilization, the natural and requisite government must not only be completely authoritarian, but must be one of which the inner structure and purposes are concealed from the majority by means of a religion or equivalent faith to which citizens and masses alike will give implicit and unquestioning obedience.” [He says this in a book review: Here]. Nazism (National Socialism) was, more-or-less, a “secular religion” which reached into all areas of German life. It was logical and it worked — and best of all it involved no back-from-the-dead bullshit like Christianity did.

Dr. Oliver is not the only wise man to advocate authoritarian/autocratic government. Many wise men have done so:

“In other words, it (czarist Russia) fell, not because it was autocratic – an autocracy at least implies an autocrat with a will and a purpose – but because it had long ceased to be autocratic, and was merely weak, incompetent, and lacking in policy, will and purpose.” — George Pitt-Rivers, in his book “The World Significance of the Russian Revolution” (1920). Pitt-Rivers was once the wealthiest man in England, and he was jailed for 2 years during WWII for “thought crimes”: “Pitt-Rivers was held in Brixton Prison and Ascot internment centre (1940–1942) during the Second World War as a Nazi sympathiser under the Defence Regulation 18B” — Wikipedia, March 2022. If he were a Bolshevik sympathizer, that would have been just fine. Indeed, the Soviets were Britain’s “allies” during WWII. Some “allies”!

Re: the post “El Salvador President Asks if the Destruction of the United States is Being Done Intentionally” (VNN, Feb. 3, 2022).

I heard someone ask: “why would anyone deliberately destroy America, the greatest country in history (until circa 1912, anyway)?” I can think of 2 reasons why: 1) to destroy the White middle class (which is the foundation of American society); 2) to usher-in socialism and the Great Reset. (Another possible reason is: to speed up the creation of a North American Union, which would likely kill our constitution and require a new one).

The normal people must divorce themselves from the abnormal people. Need a litmus test for that? How about Donald Trump? That’s a great litmus test because everybody has a strong opinion about Trump. Find out how “Person X” feels about Trump. Be subtle and indirect. Find out and then act accordingly. Blacklist him/her from then onward.

“It is time, after over two years of unchecked government tyranny and unhinged insanity of half the population, for The Great Uncleaving – that is what I am calling for sane people in the West to undertake immediately.”

[Article].

A 2019 think-tank strategy outlined what should happen if the West decided to wage war on Russia. But how ironic that the West is doing just that, right now! Wow! A spooky Cohencidence! It is just a Cohencidence, right? Right?? No???

“First of all – the plan establishes – Russia must be attacked on the most vulnerable side, that of its economy strongly dependent on gas and oil exports: for this purpose commercial and financial sanctions must be used and, at the same time, Europe must be made to decrease the importation of Russian natural gas, replacing it with US liquefied natural gas.” (Russia’s natural gas pipeline to Germany was just canceled).

[Article].

by John Wear.

“In reality, Jews were interned in camps and ghettos during World War II because Jews were generally hostile toward Germany, and many Jewish partisans were actively killing German troops. In addition to ghetto fighters, Jewish civilians fled to the forests and enlisted in partisan units, carrying out sabotage and intelligence missions.[3] The authorities of the Third Reich reasoned that Jews had to be interned to protect against these sabotage and intelligence operations.”

Far from being innocent victims, the Jews are known for their viciousness. In Russia circa 1900, Jews were bomb-throwers and assassins against the existing order (i.e., against politicians and royalty) [1].

[Article].

.

[1] “Perhaps these reforms are the cause of the present tranquility, because the revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the Jewish race and the most effective revolutionary agency is the Jewish Bund, which has its headquarters at Bialystok, where the massacre occurred last June. The government has suffered more from that race than from all of its other subjects combined. Whenever a desperate deed is committed it is always done by a Jew and there is scarcely one loyal member of that race in the entire Empire.” — from the article “The Revolution In Russia” by William E. Curtis, National Geographic Magazine, May, 1907; pages 313 and 314 (this article is about the 1905-1907 revolution, not the later 1917 revolution). [Here] and [Here].

Different American TV news anchors, on camera, all saying the exact same 7 words:

“This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.”
“This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.”
“This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.”
“This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.”
“This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.”
“This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.”
“This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.”

For once, I agree with the mainstream media: when multiple news outlets say exactly the same thing, that’s very dangerous.

[Video; 1 minute, 38 seconds; it begins at the 1-minute mark].

I frequently focus on newbies, since oldbies already know. I learned that from Dr. William Pierce, who always posed things in a way in which the newbie could easily grasp them. (A great example of that is Pierce’s ADV broadcast/essay “How It Fits Together” which is a must-read).

Recall about two weeks ago, when I quoted Dr. Jordan Peterson as saying that it was stupid of the American Left to abandon its political base of the White, blue-collar, working class and instead embrace “The Other” (i.e., Blacks, Browns, Jews, women, queers, etc., i.e., “identity politics people”) [1]. (That White, blue-collar political base was surprisingly diverse: it contained centrists, populists, leftists and even some rightists. But that base is long gone: as the Democrats moved more and more left-ward, it vanished).

There was a logical reason for the Left’s “embracing of The Other” and — in my opinion — this is the reason.

The Old Left (circa 1935) focused mostly on class and labor issues. Labor unions and so forth. It didn’t focus much on social issues like race, sexism, feminism, etc.

The New Left, however, was a different breed of cat. It was more radical and it contained more Jewish intellectuals. Indeed, the New Left is often called “the Judeo-Left” and its godfather is the Jewish intellectual Herbert Marcuse (1898-1979). (The New Left is a “Jewish construct,” beginning primarily with the Frankfurt School at Columbia University in New York City, until it emerged full-bloom from the universities circa 1964. Other notable Jews in the New Left included Claude Levi-Strauss, Max Horkheimer, Paul Krassner, Jerry Rubin, Abby Hoffman, Herbert Aptheker and various leaders of Students for a Democratic Society [SDS]).

Jews are naturally paranoid people. Could the Jews really count on the Left’s White, blue-collar base when the chips were down? How did the Jews know that the blue-collar Whites wouldn’t suddenly embrace White nationalism at the worst possible time (for example, during a war or an economic collapse)? The answer, of course, was that the Jews had no guarantees that that wouldn’t happen. The Whites could have, in theory, turned on the Jews at any moment by embracing White nationalism and anti-Semitism under the leadership of a “Hitler-type/Coughlin-type” figure.

So, the Jews avoided that potential problem by having the Left abandon its White, working-class base and instead embrace “The Other,” which created a “coalition of the fringe groups.” It’s a much “safer” setup for the Jews. (Adding to that, the “coalition setup” also capitalized on the 1960s civil-rights movement. Suddenly, Blacks, Browns and women had more political power and more money to donate to political causes, too) [2].

.

[1] the “American Left” means not only the Democratic Party, but other groups who tailor their political messages to certain people — to women for example.